 |
| video |
Know thwart the evil plans traps
The plans are always presented in their best sides. But some, it may seem tempting (5 kg in two weeks, without frustration with sugar or meat will, etc.) can be dangerous to health (nutritional imbalance, yoyo risk of loss because weight too fast, etc.).
It is therefore essential to choose the right diet, one that is effective in the long term, but also one that is best for you depending on your metabolism, the amount of weight to lose, your lifestyle etc.
First question to ask to distinguish between good and bad diets
This regime he removes one or more food groups?
By completely removing one or more categories food, you are exposed to nutritional imbalances that can be very dangerous to health. Thus, it is necessary to rule out plans announcing "sugar", "fat-free", "protein-free" etc. A good diet includes all food categories, but sensible proportions. For example, fruit and vegetables are preferred for their vitamin and fiber. Then come the grains and starches, also for their fibers but also for their vegetable protein. Then the fish for their protein but also for their omega-3, the fatty acids beneficial to the cardiovascular system. And finally, meat, fish, eggs and dairy products that have the advantage of providing animal protein, but the disadvantage of being high in fat. So for fat, those of animal origin are clearly minimize, in favor of vegetable oils . As for sugar, it is not to be eliminated, it is necessary to keep the contributions but reasonable. Sugar nature is not inherently bad for health. What he especially needed is avoid multiple sweet products that hide fat. This is the case pastries, cakes, cookies, cereals, etc.
Other questions to ask...
The scheme promises to lose more than one to two pounds a week.
This type of diet may be that particularly restrictive. It is certainly possible to take one to two weeks, sometimes more, but these schemes create frustration that must one day or the other only. It is precisely what is called the yoyo diet: it loses a lot of weight in a short time, it is very encouraging! But it cracks quickly also, it takes revenge on the food and it resumes instantly lost weight, with often one or two kilos in premium. These rapid changes are not good for health.
This regime has less than 1,200 calories per day.
Too drastic a diet less than 1,200 calories cannot give what the body needs to function. It can cause harmful nutritional deficiencies.
Is this a "fat burner" regime?
There is no food or supplement to burn fat. The only way to lose fat is to limit contributions or lose by physical exercise.
What dieting can be tracked for several consecutive years, or even life?
If the primary function of a diet is to allow a weight loss, still need to be sustainable.
The hardest is not to lose kilos, but do not resume.
This is why a good diet is based on learning. It must enable a lasting change in dietary habits.
So it's progressive, non-binding in the long term and possible life.
The right plan
The right plan is therefore the opposite of all these criteria. It integrates each food category in fair proportion, can be followed over very long periods, or even life, to lose weight very gradually but permanently.
The sport accounts for half
And most importantly, the right plan should always promote physical activity. Weight management rests not only on food inputs, but equally on spending! So never forget to physical activity, even moderate, as a half-hour of brisk walking every day, that's already it, you will then increase.
No comments :
Post a Comment